Our Weedy Florilegium (wip)

Yak-shaving monotonic and non-monotonic temporalization

“The public has no history and no future, the public lives in a golden moment created by a credit system which binds them ineluctably to a web of illusions that is never critiqued.” (Terence McKenna)

We’ve stumbled into a restless web. It lacks the properties of

• Universality (Tim Berners-Lee) and Accessibility
• Durability (Gregory Bateson: A Recursive Vision)
• Convertibility (Pierre Klossowski)
• Priority (Transcendental “in-itself” or function, inclusion, radical presentation of history)

or elsewhere rendered as “CAP theorem” or Karpman’s triangle, and so on but so therefore lacks specification in describing the conditions for the possibility of, Mike Amundsen writes:

• Safety GET vs not-GET, correlates to which HTTP status codes?
• Idempotence GET, OPTIONS, HEAD, TRACE, CONNECT; or is Amundsen right? — POST, DELETE, etc.?
• (Im)mutability POST, PUT, PATCH
• Presentation/Transclusion GET

Transclusion is primarily where the Object-Relation distinction resolves at the interpretative grounds being information such that time-like curved knot invariants’ unlinks may be decomposed into periodic elliptical curve signatures which illuminate the patho-nomological substrate in the last instance as measures diagonalizing the protocological into a topology of matter-flow, or hypothetico-deductive, indeterminacy in medium specificity. Transcendental inclusion is the deterministic ground of the computational aesthetic dimension, whereof what could be becomes what should be through self-actualization. We must remind ourselves that there is no logical or factual contradiction in the assertion of determinism: an antichain of pair-by-pair incomparable condtions productive in-itself and for-itself that generates the future without identification, without scale, without coordination.

We add then:

• Scalability (Scale-free; X-axis scaling, see The Art of Scalibility)
• Reliability (Coordination-free; Z-axis scaling)
• Durability (Expressivity/Programmability/not stronger than deterministically context-free; Y-axis scaling, see functional decompositions)
• Visibility (Identification-free; A-axis scaling, knot invariants, rotations around the third axis, Y)

Logic Alphabet gives us to:

• Rule
• Commuting
• Conversion
• Negation

in medium specificity for request/response, publish/subscribe (resthooks.org), and whatever other (regions of) epistemologies treat “survival in ecosystems as the survival of relationships embodied in patterns of communication which are fos­tered by durability of descriptive propositions or ideas.” ([my emphasis]; A Recursive Vision. Peter Harries-Jones on Gregory Bateson)

For Paul Cockshott, we must satisfy two irreducible requirements, though we seek to decentralize distributed control of his system specification (or framework, economic architectural style):

• Constraint 1: System for periodically revising final outputs based on *-preferences and relative costs for producing alternative goods
• Constraint 2: Method for calculating implications of any ensemble of final outputs

In the second case we can apply Fourthness to syllogism in “maximizing overall fitness and minimizing the sacrifice of independent credibility in a consistent and empirically significant body of beliefs” (Bredo Johnsen, Righting Epistemology) but more importantly, we want to extend and map Cockshott’s system such that

• The syntactic structure of indefinitely many strings can be analyzed (Mutability; Asychronic)
• Recognition of syntactic form entails recognition of closely related syntactic forms (Constraint 2::Safety; Synchronic)
• An item falls into an identifiable syntactic category in each string in which it occurs, and the syntactic analysis of a complex expression is a function of the syntactic roles of the items that make it up (Constraint 1::Presentation; Diachronic)
• Strings of similar syntactic type have similar effects (Idempotence; Uchronic)

These additional Constraints (James Garson’s “Cognition without Classical Architecture”) to Cockshott’s system decentralizes it should it be developed through web technologies, and yet still cohere with Fodor’s constraints of Productivity, Systematicity of Representation, Systematicity of Inference, Compositionality. In terms of programming abstractions, we can leverage Promises, Guesses, Apologies and Memories (as neural networks, connectionist nets for syntactic structures, Petri nets of biological component (bioentropical performatives) interactions between modal functions, etc.) via CALM conjecture. Why does Cockshott’s system require “Idempotence” and “Safety”? There may be obvious reasons here under a particularist epistemic setting, and we certainly want to sidestep Gettier-problems, virtue epistemology, and the like, by focusing on justifications (as Johnsen does), or justifications as shapes conforming to our series of time (whether given A, B, C or E Series) in order to give them to paradigmatic and empirically-friendly meaning-tags. Quick to the punch we see Paul Saka’s psychologistic semantics as field configuration of unified fields of subjectivization from Sebastian Fauvel’s Spinozistic QFT subtending the formulization of Kripke structures. Intuitively Sebastien Rödl’s joint spontaneous knowledge, albeit uninteresting and useless, coheres with the temporal structures constituting the second-person negotiator, co-negotiator, etc. (in Badiou’s language we should say pair-by-pair incomparable conditions inducing an antichain) of the E-series, enabling the punctuating of non-local temporal and rhetorical relations through their agreeing medium specificities (again, a theory of sensible relations induced by theory-making practices conditioned by ecological constraints, or relations, and philosophical decisions; ecosophic cartographies borne of the conditions of impossibility between incogruent worlds under ontological revolution, motivated by power growing co-terminously as disjoint, generaligivetemporalization). These numbers bound the knot group selection range by which the unknot is determined in the last instance, assuming Lorentz invariance; therefore, affordances may be contingent a priori propositions given parameterization has regulatory properties specified, durability, convertibility, etc.

Temporalization involves centered notation, often enough we use the algebra although musical notation captures the rotational limit potential the same form; time signatures encode the positional and orientational frames through which content and context interplay to process sound stages subtending the notion of logical monotonicity, atonality, and the like. Peers of a horizontal, heterarchical, etc. network may generate proofs if it is true that if it is true that their antichain is monotonically growing then it is true that its antichain is monotonically growing. The elements of coordination, identification, scale and expressivity become observable and monitor-able elements of the information network which has only one representation, since “only one visualization has ever been made of an information network” (Alexander Galloway. The Interface Effect. 2013). This limits our instrumental, cognitive and representational capacity for any interpretative ground that constrains in like kind with developmental, descriptive and explanatory theory-making, -building, and so on.

Shroom Univocity and Unitopologies

Cybernetic Mereology

FALCON (Fully Automated Leptographical Communist/Commonist/Intercommunalist/Commensalist/Communalisation Opportunity Now)

We rebut the acephalian communist moment as well as the Communist Hypothesis advanced by Badiou and their renditions. A simple solution would merely involving representational micro data to dress our semantics, although Segmented Discourse Representation Theory sublimates the metalanguage, language-object distinctions, so therefore the object-relation dualism fancied by the later improvisers of Virtue Ethics (e.g. Alasdair MacIntyre); or even, most obviously that General Economy proposed in Georges Bataille’s proto-accelerationist fury. Why should nature, subtending the word as a non-dual processual performation indeed *require* governance in its cyclical realizations of time, as temporalization and templexity (Land). There are many characterologics of time: geological, mythical, machinic, subjective, material, territorial…

The E-series confers a measure of not a “Metric Standard” but a non-dual standing immanently lacking objective becoming as much as being-without-givenness. John McTaggart may have suggested the notion in The Unreality of Time, however, it is a murky concept still. Linguistic anthropologists have managed their fair lot of distinctions no sooner, in performing the concepts diachronic and synchronic, parole and language, as irreducible measures not unlike Baruch Spinoza’s pluralistic attribute-centric causal theory. To say the least, the distinction has become a bit of a Buridan’s Ass. How might, then, philosophy regulate its own suicide?

Domain-Driven Hypermedia-Oriented Design

Our developments in OWL Time:

Notably we find that in Laruelle’s genericism we can create a semantics of tri-temporally-oriented verified claims. A first-order architectural question equates itself to an application and domain, since these subsystems will invariably require typing. Further our mapping is isomorphic to the impossibility of intent which grounds the expressivity of philosophy.

Psychosomatic control

Hypermedia Controls (embeddable) as Content words

Monotonic and non-monotonic media factors (monomedia) causally implicating consistency and coordination through time. We may therefore abandon CAP theorem or at least demote and discourage its use in underpinning the ethical principles of science. Is a pirate’s treasure invented or discovered? An altered state of consciousness? Mere usury?

Noogenetic control

Nature affords no global time constraint or tyranny of the clock, or at any rate, this is what we mean when we invoke the hiddenness of nature, the invisible hand, and so on which plague Big-O notation with an equally hidden tax, much cause to power grid cascading failures on to sublinear preferential attachment in current-sees. Why should any proletarian be granted the right to levy a tax at any moment or as much, why should a secret police be a requirement of wide obligation? Indeed nature extols these bioentropic processes which tax for fit democratically throughout the intermodular brain, using the mind toward its ends, and moreover heterarchy flails before yet another veil of ignorance attributed to each lawyer engaged in reflective equilibrium departing from toward internal view of law, becoming not being conditioned to its own impossibility (an actualization and exemplification of a unilateral duality) failing short of autarkic oppression, dispossession, and further proletarianization, deterritorialization, pharmacolonialization, and the like, as any Slingshot Argument shows the shared criteria, or understanding, if one takes on DARRT seriously, becomes entangled in a labor token that depends on medium specificity lacking finality, sovereignty, even lesser the erotic and the novel, as such, false genres of skill but rather performations of the absurd. Matters not if ‘pataphysical experimentation too conforms to the ethical standards apparent to scientific method, at once a procedure of truth. The consequence of this trade of art failing its speaking implement orchestration, or coordination, non-monotonicity, as much as any hidden tax, may bring semantic internet to a muddle of middling complexity. But first, a semantic web possess accessibility, universality, convertibility, priority, durability :: safety (distributivity), idempotence (discussivity), mutability (debate), transclusion (description), (deconstruction) …

Degradable Media Models qua medium specificity as Service words

Noopolitical speech carries with it the presence of George Lakoff’s orienting or conduit metaphor: its repetition conditions for the possibility of its impossible modulation, at once against differentiation. The paradoxical conditions of objectification and classification resemble as family the substrate horizontalism of networks embedded within networks.

Models of Labor-identity (wip)

• Space-time (Time-space) as Openness| Matter-flow with Medium Specificity | Data | Discovery layer | Competition
• Attribute as Conscientiousness as Narrative | Action | Narration layer | Commensalism
• Capability as Extraversion as Deconstruction | Resource | Value layer | Amensalism
• Relationship as Adaptability/Agreeableness as Interdepending | Representation | Mutualism
• Presentation as Neuroticism as Affective | Transition | Predation

SOLCQS ::

• Singularity,
• Openness,
• Substitutability,
• Command,
• Query,
• Segregation

:: HEXACO ::

Irreducible, manifold complexities being objectification and classification reflected in subjectivization and computational unconscious, machinic, subjective, territorial and material unconscious (Guattari, Herrman) given being without givenness is riven since first philosophy.

• Honesty-Humility
• Dignity-Honor
• Respect-Sacrifice
• Entity-(Value object)
• Object-Relation

Are the rhetorical and temporal relations irreducible? That would be the main benefit of a theory of sensible relations. (Relating this to Beatrice M. Fazi’s recent work Contingent Computation: the “affective level of the real”.) Within the the current notational affords of 4th generation programming languages, disorderly and declarative programming allows for the creation of distributed control systems that are installed to mediums of a range in the commercial markets at a rate far exceeding state adaptability and adoption. Curious machines live in the web (Mariposa, Meltdown, etc.) that should have given the market more instability than would be expected. State deploys wane on the topic, still reflecting on email servers as more entrenched problems stir the damage current in the alleged decentralized web. Accessibility constraints hardly allow for a meaningful evaluative set of shared criteria from which to produce a shared understanding of the quantitative or qualitative, manner or relevance dimensions of rule of recognition.

1. Optimizing Inter-Service Communication Between Microservices
2. Extending the REpresentational State Transfer (REST) Architectural Style for Decentralized Systems
3. Five Types of Ecological Relationships https://sciencing.com/five-types-ecological-relationships-7786.html
4. Metaphors We Live By http://theliterarylink.com/metaphors.html