nonmetacomputational hypermedia abstractive performations

<link
rel="
[x]--|--|--|--|--|--[x]
[x]--|--|--|--|--|--[x]
[x]--|--|--|--|--|--[x]
[x]--|--|--|--|--|--[x]
"
href="http://example.app" />
<!-- . --><h[q]ddddddhdddddddhdddpppdhdddpppd
hdddddddh[q]ddddddhdddpppdhddddddd
hdddddddhddddddh[q]dddddddhddddddd
hdddddddhddddppphdddddddh[q]dddddd
href="ex.app?#aRbaRbaRb"
rel="a + R + b and a + R + b and a + R + b" />
<link
rel=""<<EOF
(aRb)->(bRc)
(bRc)->(cRd)
...
EOF""
href=""ex.app?[]R=..."" />
<link
rel="A(×)B=([P=minus(round_up(A), A)]×B)-([Q=minus(round_up(B), B)]×A)-(P×Q)"
href="multiply.app/85d94e574...3e27d63e916694e5e092"
/>
<link
rel="Gj"
href="g.app" />
<link
rel="∀x(Gx→Rx)"
href="g-r.app" />
<link
rel="∀x(Rx→Ux)"
href="r-u.app" />
<link
rel="Gj→Rj"
href="g-r.app" />
<link
rel="Rj→Uj"
href="g-u.app" />
<link
rel="Rj"
href="r.app" />
<link
rel="Uj"
href="u.app" />

none of this really matters yet because most of you are incentivized to ask me questions about trust and truth, the stuff of the a priori and how it all hangs together in these software architectures. piddling about javascript syntax and walking me to the order of the latest tc39 developments is simply missing the forest for the trees. y’all have tragically undertheorized the ecological as much as the racialized aspects of your engineering commitments; structural and ontological problems haunt your codebases, and you ignore the autonomy of the real. you’re more interested in what i understand psychological concepts to be exactly because you know you ought to be thinking in terms of affordances, not (just) abstraction hierarchies. you present no ontologies to ground your unit tests, no audits for accessibility nor front end validation, hardly ever any consistent effort to talk about behavior-driven development and why the hypermedia web developers have preferred it in tandem with test-driven development. you have yet to keep up with the w3c’s ecology team as much as its philosophy team:

“Isn’t there a need for cacheing the results of the various reasoners in a FOL form?”[fol]

you simply ignore them and the director, timbl. you ignore stallman. you ignore dr fielding.

i do not care what you think about my idiosyncratic way of writing javascript. you don’t know what semantics-driven code design is about in the first place. you think this work can be achieved aphilosophically and apolitically. you’re not (just) privileged, you’re performing the philosophy to obscure yourselves and raise yourselves above critique on stolen land in a slavocracy with other people’s capital.

you’re not serious people, and as david bohm notes, yet you can still be dangerous if not deadly to yourselves and to our planet.

drink your tea.

--

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store