If language is generative of communication and learning, what tools would condition the possibility or capability unique to language using living beings? Would it be that non-being confounds the enablement and realization of linguistic machining, languaging and the rest, categorized and classified as productivity, inference, representation and compositionality? Social animals often fail to express these properties even at the level of social praxis (praxeonomics), typically fashioning tools for individual, but not social use beyond mere triviality.
Since the advent of the conceptual scheme, academics and students have engaged in modes of discourse that divide along the distinction of the empirical verification of the effectiveness of learning styles. Should we wonder if programming styles are grounded in the same or similar ensemble of abstractions and representations, or patterns of recognition which would resolve in epistemic justifications that are networked information? Of course the credibility of lateral thinking and the non-standard model become those bases of cognitivity for which an educator or educologist is in want of principles to determine the spatiotemporal interlocking with the language-object as a meaning-tag engenders the information necessary for empirically-friendly development, description, interpretation and explanation of hypotheses. Should theories and conjectures gain competitive ground or establish ontological commitment across all modes of discourse, the application of Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT) suggests a tenable mapping between rhetorical relations and sensible relations (Contingent Computation. Beatrice M. Fazi).
The dispute amongst languages concerns their capacity for ensuring or maximizing maintainability, comprehensibility, efficiency, simplicity or elegance, fruitfulness (prediction-readiness or predictability, assuming the hidden tax of Big-O notation is mitigated or minimized by something like a type system), and so on.
“Communicative praxis and the space of subjectivity”
Pharmacolonialism of Panspermia
Code as Law
Code as Capital